Another chaotic week but I struggle on. And now, Saturday, the codes are filled in on the diary cards.
So this week we are almost half way through January, and it sure is going very fast. So we need your club meeting dates as a matter of urgency - if you have them do pass them along. There are lots of prospective visitors out there but they need to know when and where to come. Many thanks for any you can supply. And that is your task for this week!
After you have digested what follows, of course.....
Primrose Confectionery Co. Ltd [trade : confectionery : UK] "Laurel & Hardy" (1968) 29/50 - PRI-240 : PRI-9
So we start this week with Laurel and Hardy.
As to why we have Laurel and Hardy, well today in 1892 Harry Eugene Roach was born. He was made of tough stuff, he was born in New York, and travelled to California via Alaska, where he hunted for gold, worked in construction, and even skinned mules. He also gambled. On the way he stopped off to take part in a film he saw being made. In that film was a young man who would end up as Harold Lloyd, via "Lonesome Luke", and even "Winkle". Mr Roach was but an extra, though he claimed he did stunt work too. Whatever he did, the whole experience was so thrilling, he went to Hollywood, and changed his name to Hal Roach.
He was perfect for the movies, and he did everything over what would turn out to be an eighty year career, acting, writing, directing and producing his films, many of them at his own Hal Roach Studios, which he opened in 1914, and giving the world many of its funniest stars including Harold Lloyd, Harry Langdon, and Laurel and Hardy, to name but a few.
The only fly in the ointment was his continued rivalry with Mack Sennett, who, oddly, was born this week as well. And we feature him later! They even fought over a name, both claiming to be "The King of Comedy". But Mack Sennett was already more established, and doing well, and Hal Roach kept picking away, borrowing many of his ideas, and changing them, just slightly, dressing his stars in the same way, using similar names. Yet he also had great ideas of his own, a series called Our Gang, a group of wonderfully diverse children and a dog getting into all kinds of scrapes, and making an animal, namely Rex the Wonder Horse, the star of another series of films.
Americans came into the First World War late, and i have not been able to find out what Hal Roach did. But in the Second World War he gave his studio and grounds to the effort, it was used for training, and he was also in the Signal Corps. He also moved seamlessly into television, and also was very shrewd, converting his most popular characters into tv characters, then licensing them for home movies, starting with film reels for projectors, and moving in to video. Some thought this was selling out, but in many ways this ensured their success would remain for many generations
He died on November the second 1992, aged 100.
This card first appears in our British Trade Index part 2 issued in 1969, where it is described as having two printings
-
a) album clause "Be sure to send for..."
-
b) album clause "For a super picture card album ...
By the time of our fourth original British Trade Index a further back has been discovered
-
c) back without album clause.
This is our printing above. However then book also complicates things further by saying that you can find the wording "Printed in England" measuring either A) 19 m/m or B) 14 m/m
Our updated British Trade Index adds the date of issue (1968) the size 64 x 34 m/m, and the fact that it was a numbered set of fifty cards. Then it also adds another difference, the fact that the thickness of the board used to print the card on actually differs, being either
-
a) paper thin
-
b) thin
-
c) thick
It also tells us that the cards with the 14 m/m "Printed in England" were all on thick card, but does not explain which of the other printings were the paper thin, or the thin.
John Player & Sons [tobacco : UK] "Military Head Dress" (March 1931) 34/50 - P644-228 : P72-110 : RB.17/124 : P/124
Today, January 15th, has been National Hat Day since 1983. And how you celebrate it is simply to wear a hat you own and love, or find out about a hat from history.
Hats have several purposes, they keep you warm whilst working outdoors, and they can sometimes protect you from injury, in the case of military and sporting headgear. They also denote differences in religion or in status. And right up to the Second World War, ladies were supposed to keep their heads and their hair covered - something which persists in some countries and religions to this day. This is why many cards of beauties show them wearing hats.
Our reference books add that this set was never an export issue, which seems odd for it is a very attractive and informative one which shows military helmets and headdress from 1768 to 1904, and includes dress wear as well as battle wear. Some of the many styles are busbies, bearskins, cocked hats, feather bonnets, forage caps, Grenadier`s caps, shakos, and even a Kilmarnock. They are all displayed on this classic white backdrop which makes them an excellent set to display in a military den. Our card is an Officers Full Dress helmet for the 5th Dragoon Guards, worn between 1855 and 1871 - this includes at the Crimean War, which lasted between 1853 and 1856, and also includes their participation in the Battle of Balaclava.
Now there is one oddity to look out for - this is card 37, of a 15th The King`s Hussars Officers Full Dress Shako from 1834 - and it was discovered to have an error, or rather a different printing, on the ninth line of text, which sometimes says "not illustrated" and sometimes does not. This means nothing to me, so off to the sets to look! I have had a look and it seems to refer to the cap lines of gold cord. However I have looked at four cards and not one of them says "not illustrated" so it must be either a pretty rare error or it was perhaps found to be wrong information. I will investigate!
Do note that this set was reprinted in 1999 by "The Card Collectors Society"
The Topps Company Inc. [trade/commercial : O/S : U.S.A] "Garbage Pail Kids" (2013) card 135a.
Today is the first day of the London International Mime Festival - and it runs until the 5th of February.
Now mime may be seen as simply silent theatre, but it takes its name from the Greek word for an actor, or someone who conveys emotions with their whole body, not just, or maybe not at all, with simply words. For some reason it was especially popular in Europe, maybe because Europe has so many languages that words get in the way and need explanation.
I have to say I do not like shock horror cards like this, but this actual one is not too gross or violent and I may never find another chance to display the set to those who could find it very interesting. Plus it also links in to something we used in our tribute to stickers, for the idea for these cards came from Art Spiegelman, who had previously designed Topps "Wacky Packages".
The idea behind them was supposed to be a parody on the cult plaything of the time, the Cabbage Patch Doll, but curiously these cards were first issued by Topps in 1985 and they led to the animated television series in 1987 - rather like the Mars Attacks cards led to the Tim Burton film. The American set came first, then they arrived here, though if you measure them they are a slightly different size, no idea why, but ours are smaller. as well as in Holland and neighbouring Countries. They never seemed to spread further into Europe than that.
It must be noted that most of the series followed the practise of giving three cards free with a piece of gum that you paid for, so they are technically Cartophilic.
Now what you might not know is that every card has a doppleganger, hence our card is 135a, and 135b shows Shadowy Stan - he looks very similar but the background looks darker. However there are probably several differences that my brain cannot spot as I am useless as that sort of thing! Do let us know if you see one!
Carole Lombard revelled in being one. Gloria Swanson always denied that she had ever been one, even after stills of her being one were discovered. And Mabel Normand is often thought to have been one, but actually in 1912 she had simply provided part of the spark that lit the inspiration for them.
What were they? Well let us start with Mabel Normand, who, in 1912, appeared in a film, "The Water Nymph", directed by Mikall Sinnott, who was born today in 1880, in California. Mikall, or by 1912 Mack Sennett, combined the aquatic costume of Mabel Normand and a very risque photo of the aftermath of an auto accident, and created a troupe called The Sennett Bathing Beauties. They first appear in 1915, and there were just three of them, Evelyn Lynn, Cecile or Cecily Evans, and Marie Prevost, the only one who went on to make a name for herself in motion pictures.
This card was issued in the early 1920s with Tobacco Products Corporation`s "Strollers Cigarettes", and they are known as Mack Sennett Movie Star cards, or Mack Sennett`s Bathing Beauties. And of course, Hal Roach also had bathing beauties, in very similar costume, but later, in the 1920s. What can I say!
However these cards are actually part of a larger "movie star" series, hence the numbers on them being from 201 to 220. And you can find them in a larger size as well.
John Player & Sons [tobacco : UK] "Miniatures" (June 1923) 5/25 - P644-230 : P72-111 : RB.17/127 : P/127
Today is the first day of the London Art Fair - and it continues until the 22nd.
Art is well represented on cigarette cards, though much of it is sepia or black and white. This set is an excellent example of art on cards though, for it shows accurate reproductions of painted miniatures by some of the leading artists through time, and includes their frames. The cards were first printed in 1916, and there is a strong belief that some cards were inserted into packets. However it was a short lived issue. After the First World War, the cards left over were released as their new issue, but sadly there is no way to tell which of the cards were issued in the first release.
Our original John Player Reference Book tells us that there are no colour varieties but there are proofs about, in red and/or yellow, with no wording and plain backs. There is no reference to these in the World Tobacco Issues Index, so either the supply dried up fast or they could not be tracked down in order to include them.
We have chosen this lovely card, which shows a much earlier beauty, the Countess of Eglinton. Whilst the card tells us of Sir Joshua Reynolds, it tells us nothing of the subject. Her name was Lady Jane Lindsey, and in the original picture she is full length and playing a harp. She was born in 1756 and she was the daughter of George, the twenty-first Earl of Crawford, as well as being the wife of the eleventh Earl of Eglinton, whose first name was Archibald. The picture was painted in 1777, and sadly, she died in 1778.
Or did she, for recent research suggests that this could either be a portrait of Lady Jean Lindsay, or Lady Joan Lindsay - or maybe even the twelfth Earl`s wife, Eleonora Hamilton.... You can read about that at Grand Ladies/Reynolds - and we will see what we can find out in the future!
Barratt & Co. Ltd. [trade : confectionery : UK] "History of the Air" (1959) 8/48 - BAR-480 : BAR-79
Now here is a curious fact from the archives, as today in 1915 East Anglia was attacked by zeppelins. And that made Great Yarmouth the first town in the British Isles to suffer an air raid, as well as having the first civilians to die in one.
The airships, not strictly Zeppelins, came from Hamburg in Germany, and the air raid was a bit of an accident, caused by bad weather and somehow going off course rather drastically, for their original target was the Humber estuary. In fact there were three of them but one got separated and ended up flying home. But somehow the pair ended up heading for Norfolk, in the middle of the evening, with one steering to Great Yarmouth and the other carrying on to Kings Lynn.
Great Yarmouth, being nearer, was reached first. The bombs were dropped, and a man called Samuel Smith, standing in the road, watching, was killed instantly. He was fifty-three years old, and he was a cobbler. A seventy-two year old lady called Martha Taylor was also killed, in her home, and the docks and post office were also damaged.
The other airship approached Kings Lynn dropping bombs along the way. The fatalities here were twenty-six year old Alice Gazeley, and a teenager, Percy Goate, just fourteen, who was killed as he lay asleep in bed. Several people were also injured in this attack.
Intriguingly this incident was used for propaganda by us, for it was disclosed, completely wrongly, that the target was the Royal Family, who were at Sandringham.
The events were featured on picture postcards, but apparently not on cigarette cards, and I have not found the airships, which were the L3 and L4, so have a look and see if you can spot them!
A little known fact is that fifty other raids by airships took place during the First World War, killing 557, and injuring 1,358.
But the Great Yarmouth and Kings Lynn raid was the precursor to them all.
That makes it odd that our card never mentions it, especially as the text says it was used "during the 1914-1918 War to bomb London, but proved to be very vulnerable to bad weather, as well as offering an easy target to fighter aircraft."
This card comes from the first set of Barratt "History of the Air". and guess what, this is another convoluted tale. They first appear in our British Trade Index part 2, as follows
-
1. Set of 48. Back white or cream varnished. See D299 - which reveals that this set was also issued in an anonymous version, titled "History of Aviation" and measuring 67 x 35 m/m. However it was not by Barratt but by Kilty of South Africa
-
2. Set of 32. Back in English and French, using subjects selected from set 1. All that says is "issued abroad" which is very helpful!
-
3. Set of 25. All this says is "See D202" - which reveals that it was also issued by several companies, namely Amalgamated Tobacco ("Mills" brand) also as "History of the Air", Halpins ("Willow Tea" brand) as "Aircraft of the World", and "Swettenham`s Co-Operative Institutions" Tea as "Aircraft of the World"
This information is slightly updated in our most modern British Trade Index, the dates are given, of 1959 for the first two printings and 1960 for the third. Also it gives the measurements, so we find out that the Kilty version was actually two m/m taller than the Barratt.
Impel Marketing Inc [commercial : O/S : U.S.A.] "Star Trek 25th Anniversary" (1991) card 123/310
Today would have been the birthday of Jackson DeForest Kelley, shown here in his most famous role of Senior Surgeon and Lt.Commander Dr. Leonard "Bones" McCoy. And it was Captain James T Kirk who gave him the nickname "Bones".
But sadly he died in 1999.
Strangely when growing up he had wanted and planned to be a doctor but it was too expensive to study, despite the fact that an uncle of his was a doctor and surely could have eased his path.
He was well known to Gene Roddenberry, who created Star Trek, and he would have liked him to play the doctor from the start, but the role in the pilot went to someone else and he did not appear until 1966. Some people say that he was waiting to see if it would be a hit, but I think that is probably untrue. He did also play other parts, mainly in westerns, And he was in six of the spin off Star Trek motion pictures
Star Trek is too young for cigarette cards, but it does appear on lots of trade cards and commercial trading cards. And the earliest sets were issued by Leaf in 1967 and by A & B C Gum in 1969.
The Leaf set is the most sought after, despite it being in black and white, and having major inaccuracies in the text, but it is very rare for it was only distributed in the Chicago area. However there are reprints, so be very careful to examine what you think you are buying.
The A & B.C. Gum set of fifty-five cards is also odd, because though it is called Star Trek, it is based on just one episode of the series. It also has errors in the text, starting with card one of Captain Roger Kirk. However the cards were colour, and had a "Space Fact" printed at the bottom of each card, which at that time was fuel to the fire of the young collectors dreams. They also had the bright blue borders which would be copied by later film tie in sets, though this caused the worst problem for current collectors as they peeled and flaked off with wear and tear, and the corners turned into grey board. .
Our card is one of the original series cards, and has an odd number - but the set also includes cards from Star Trek : The Next Generation which had even numbers, and it was issued in two parts, however it was designed that the whole formed one set.
This week's Cards of the Day...
have been celebrating a day that I bet few of our modern trade collectors even know exist. For on January 13th it is National Sticker Day. This refers to any kind of sticker, and there are loads of them out there, ones for every interest you can imagine. The story of the sticker actually started with stamps, but the idea of licking something or gluing it caught on, and it was soon realised you could print any picture on paper and stick it wherever you liked.
The 1960s seem to have been the heyday, and political, or rather anti political, and anti war, stickers promoting Peace, and Love, and turning almost every O into the Ban The Bomb sign, were lavishly applied to faces and musical instruments. Many of these were plastic, and you just peeled off the backing sheet and stuck the pre-sticky front on. Bumper stickers started here as well. As did sticker trade cards, including our first clue card
Saturday, 7th January 2023
A great start to our week with this one - the subject is, of course, Denis Law, or more correctly Denis Law, Commander of the British Empire.
However the clue was the set, Panini`s "Footballers 1961/2", also known as "Calciatore 1961/2" which is generally regarded to be their first set of stickers! In fact this was incorrect, for not all of the cards were stickers, and for purists, the first Panini sticker set to be entirely composed of stickers was "Football 1972/3". Now you might be thinking that you have seen a set called Calciatori 1960-61 which beats this. That is actually a very odd story indeed, for it is a reprint, by the newspaper La Gazetta dello Sport, and it was not by Panini at all. You can read more about that at the FootballCartophilicExchange/Calciatori And to save you hitting the dictionary, Calciatore means footballer in Italian, but specifically it means a striker. A goalkeeper was a portiere, which technically means a gate keeper. I am certain that there were goalkeepers in the set though?
Now this is not Denis Law`s rookie card, that is the 1959 card issued by Top Flight Sweet Cigarettes where he is card 24/25, and it shows him at Huddersfield Town, his first team, between 1956 and 1960. And the text on that card ties the date down very well as it speaks of his recent transfer to Manchester, and this, of course, was Manchester City. The contract was signed on the 15th of March 1960. By the way, his transfer fee was the highest ever recorded, £55,000. He only stayed at Manchester City for a year, and his next club is shown on our card. This is actually a rather cool connection because both Panini and Torino are based in Italy. Panini is actually in Modena, but there is only about two hours driving time between the two. However sadly he did not get on well in Italy, and moved back to Manchester, but United, in 1962
Sunday, 8th January 2023
This clue here is the horse`s name Blue GUM, which refers to the original form of the sticker, where it was just a piece of paper and you had to apply your own stickiness. Also to the fact that many early advertising cards were pressed into another use and stuck down adorning all manner of scrapbooks and other items. The same set does have a horse called Glue, but I dont want to think about that, I just hope he raced really well and saved himself and I will never google it. And don`t you tell me!
The most popular early glue was made of flour and water. You mixed the flour and a little salt with water and mixed it into a paste. There was no cooking, but you had to wait until it dried. This was not a great glue for thin papers but on the thick advertising cards it was fine for it seldom showed through or wrinkled. Some early recipes used milk, but that surely would have gone off and smelt?
Before "racing" on, some people have asked why when a set is issued in Australia, like this one, we have UK as the country code. The answer is that the code is designed to send you to the right part of most dealer catalogues and lists, and all the Wills brand issues usually follow the home issues within the UK section.
Its first appearance in a reference book is Wills part 3, where it is described as having "Fronts lithographed in colour, backs in green, with descriptive text. Australian issue, about 1906" . This is a guess, based on the text, for it does not appear in the lists of issue dates that appeared in the Wills Works Magazine. Our reference book also says that "All cards are found with backs reading from opposite sides", which basically means that there was a bit of a mix up at the printers and when they put some of the sheets of cards in they were upside down. It cannot have been just one sheet out of place because finding those fifty cards and bringing them together would be a very hard task, so there must have been enough to make it fairly easy to gather up a complete set of that error printing. Unless these came from one uncut sheet, and when compared to cards in someone`s collection it was discovered quite by chance?
Our original World Tobacco Issues Index of 1956 does not mention the upside down text variation at all, which is a bit sad as it says that there are three printings, each with a different brand, and that means that we now do not know which of these was the one with the upside down texts. Anyway the brands were :
-
A) Capstan
-
B) Havelock
-
C) Vice Regal
It also links to RB.21/200-75, which is the original British American Tobacco Reference. That adds more back designs and other issuers, namely :
-
D) Anonymous issue with letterpress on the back
-
E) "Cameo" issue
-
F) "Old Judge" issue
-
G) "Vanity Fair" issue
They also added that the "Cameo" issue came through American Tobacco of Australia Ltd, via "Cameo Cigarettes", and that "Old Judge" and "Vanity Fair" cigarettes, which they believed were possibly sponsored by American firms Goodwin and Kimball. However according to our Australia and New Zealand Reference Book RB.30, "Cameo" was an offshoot of British American Tobacco, and they even give it the code B116-241. They do not seem to list an American Tobacco of Australia at all, so they are a mystery.
By the time of our updated World Tobacco Issues Index there has been a bit more information again. They say that "Cameo" was a brand issue with no company name, retailed between 1900 and 1906 in Australasia and elsewhere. This suggests the set was also available in New Zealand, but "elsewhere" is not of great help! They add that "Cameo" was originally a Duke brand, but control passed to British American Tobacco in 1902, which means that it must have been an overseas brand. Under British American Tobacco it issued three sets of cards, "Beauties - Curtain Background", "Beauties - Lantern Girls" and our set.
As far as "Old Judge" and "Vanity Fair", they also passed to British American Tobacco at the same time
Now as far as Blue Gum, I can find nothing. There is quite a bit in the racing annals about his brother Blue Spec, shown in this set as card 46/50, also out of Specula by True Blue, for he won the Perth Cup and the Kalgoorlie Cup, the top races in Western Australia, and he won the 1905 Melbourne Cup in the fastest time ever to that date.He then appears to have gone to stud, and it says he sired two big winners and others. Our card even admits that Blue Gum had "No winning performances to end of 1906". Perhaps they thought he would rival his brother, and if he did they would be able to look miraculous.
Monday, 9th January 2023
This was the most fiendish clue, for here we have the Needles, and needles are another kind of sticker, as in a sticker-in-your-finger. However it is a great test of our forthcoming card index as here we have a companion to a card we featured on the 20th of June , which you can visit at
https://csgb.co.uk/cardoftheday/2022-06-20 which is the W. D. & H. O. Wills` Three Castles branded version, issued in New Zealand.
Today`s card actually starts off being listed in our Wills reference book part four, as W/255. It is described as "Fronts printed by letterpress, in colour. Backs in light green, with descriptive text. Export issues, between 1925 - 1930,
-
A) New Zealand Issue "The Three Castles"
-
B) General Overseas Issue, anonymous backs
It next turns up in the British American Tobacco reference book RB.21, issued in 1952, though strangely it is not in the main body of the book, just the index section. However this does tell us that it was issued in 1926, and a place of issue, that being Malaya and the Channel Islands.
In 1956, our original World Tobacco Issues Index splits the Wills version and our anonymous one rather far apart. You will find ours in the anonymous "Z" section, listed under "Anonymous Issues (1) - with letterpress on backs". Then you have to travel to section 2. "English Language issues without reference to tobacco", and on to section 2C, "Issues 1919 - 1940", and to Section B, "Overseas Issue s through B.A.T.". If you still have any eyesight left, there it says, under ZB6-43, "Lighthouses. Sm. Nd. (50) See W/255B". Strangely it does not give the "Z" number under the Wills section, that would have saved us quite a hunt!
In the most modern World Tobacco Issues Index, it repeats what is immediately above, but has a new code of ZB07-460. And it also simply says "See W/255". Again there is no cross reference from the Wills set, but I was able to follow the stages listed above, rather than orienteering from scratch.
Tuesday, 10th January 2023
This set is designed to poke a bit of gentle fun, or satirise wildly, some common household products. Several companies so parodied were not that happy, and some cards were subsituted. This led to a whole lot of confusion, but stick with me. It seems to only appear in our original British Trade Index, part three, published in 1986. That says :
TOH-18
Wacky Packages - 1975 Issue. 89x 63. Two series, inscribed "Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., Prtd in U.S.A."
1. 1st Series of 38, in two sections
-
(1) Back with series title and checklist of the 29 subjects in part 2. Nine subjects. Fronts sectional cards forming a puzzle picture.
-
(2) Plain backs, without series title. Sticker cards, front per TOH-18.1. 29 subjects as per checklist on backs of part 1
2. 2nd Series of 38, in two sections
-
(1) Back with series title and checklist of the 29 subjects in part 2. Dated 1975. Nine subjects. Fronts sectional cards forming a puzzle picture.
-
(2) Plain backs, without series title. Sticker cards, front per TOH-18.1. 29 subjects as per checklist on backs of part 1
Directly beneath this is
TOH-19 :
-
Wacky Packages - 1979 Issue. 89x 63. Front per TOH-19, inscribed "Topps Chewing Gum, Inc., Prtd in U.S.A.". Nd.(66) Backs with sectional picture, or "Wacky Packages - Series No.1 Checklist", with list of the 66 subjects.
Now American collectors say that this set, or sets, started in 1967, and that the first ones were cut to shape rather than being the black outlined shape on a white card, like ours, which followed in the early 1970s. The idea was that in the middle of the black outline was a pre-cut line and you peeled the sticker part out of the inside leaving half the line and the white card behind, and if you look at ours you can hopefully see this clearly. And someone has already contacted me, on seeing the front alone, to say that there is a great resource online at Wikipedia/Wacky - as well as a whole website devoted to them at https://wackypacks.com where we find ours, listed as being from the 7th series of 1974. However it is entirely possible that we did not get them over here until 1975.
Wednesday, 11th January 2023
Here we have one of the stickers which tied in with a 1988 cinema film called "Who Framed Roger Rabbit". This was a mixture of animation and live actors, and the story revolved around a cartoon rabbit, married to a femme fatale, who was voiced by Jessica Turner. Somehow Roger gets accused of a murder he did not commit and Bob Hoskins, in human form, not as a cartoon, is the cartoon-hating private detective who helps Roger find the truth
It is way better than it sounds, and actually it was based on a book, called "Who Censored Roger Rabbit?", which was picked up by Disney. There was also a second book, not exactly a sequel, called "Who Plugged Roger Rabbit?"
Unfortunately though the film was released in 1988, Topps had rather stolen the market by releasing their set of cards in 1987. Their "wax packs" contained nine cards and a stick of bubble gum, thus making them still authentic trade cards because you were buying the gum and the stickers were coming free. Whereas our stickers were just a packet of stickers, which technically render them into commercial territory.
Roger Rabbit was also the subject of an issue by Nabisco, and you can read about that online at CerealOffers/RogerRabbit
They were not cards, but small comics, so some collectors do not think they are truly cartophilic. However they were given away, which technically makes them more cartophilic than our set. Though as our New Issues Report makes clear, ours scraped in to cartophilia on a technicality, for "A free album and stickers were given with the `Look In` magazine dated Jan 7th 1989.
And the Nabisco set also appears as a New Issue in the same Cartophilic Notes and News >
Thursday, 12th January 2023
That`s right, I have no idea of which set this card comes from, and yet it is a super view of the tunnel at Monaco that everyone seems to like when I show it to them, So if you can tell me from which set it comes we will all thank you.
The back tells me that it is by Merlin Collections, which was a name used by Merlin Publishing Ltd. They also did football stickers and television tie in sets.
Now for the confusing bit, as the company was only started, by two ex-Panini workers, in 1989, so that means the "70" in our card cannot be the year. However Merlin was bought out by Topps in 1995, and Topps did not keep the Merlin name, tney changed it and used it as kind of European offshoot called Topps Europe Ltd. So that rules out the "98" in our card for the year as well.
There is a set which it might be, but I cannot find that online - it is the 1996 "SkySports" set. Sky ties in well with Formula One, as they took over televising the races. So if anyone can confirm that please do
Friday, 13th January 2023
Apparently this set was issued in English (Princesses), German (Prinzessinnen), French (les Princesses), Italian (Principesses), Norwegian (Prinzessen), and Spanish (Princesas). And it features the Disney kingdom`s most famous princesses, namely Cinderella, Belle, Sleeping Beauty, Snow White, Ariel and Jasmine.
And it must have been successful because several other Princess series followed.
There is good and bad about Princesses, I agree that they inspire dressing up and imagination, but the stories do boil down to them needing a Prince to sweep them off her feet, and then the story ends, which I guess it does, for however plucky the Princess is through the story, eventually there he is to make her do the housework. She never seems to be allowed to continue what she is interested in, and she definitely never says he can come round a couple of times a week, and then go off so she can live her own life again.
So now you know.
well we almost made midnight, but not quite.
I am off for a coffee now, whilst you may be sleeping, or you may be sitting there waiting to read. I like that thought, but think it is untrue.
By the way, I close by saying I no longer twitter. I am now at mastodon. And once I fathom out how to give my call sign I will share it with you all.
Until next week, happy collecting, everyone!